If you want to sell your C-suite on paying for an employee financial wellness program, you’ll probably hear this question from your CFO: What’s the ROI?
It’s natural for a chief financial officer to ask about the return on investment (ROI) from spending the organization’s money on a program that, at first glance, appears to only help employees with their lives
According to a study by PwC, 53% of full-time employed American adults say they’ve felt stressed dealing with their personal financial situation over the past five years.1 The same study finds that among financially worried Americans:
You can think about financial wellness ROI in a couple of ways:
The Short-Term Return
If your employees don’t feel financially stressed, they’re more productive in their job, miss work less, and have lower health-care expenses. This saves your company money, and the PwC paper offers a hypothetical illustration of how you can quantify that savings, using productivity as the example focus. Based on PwC’s survey, 30% of employees say they get distracted by their finances while at work, while 46% of the distracted employees say they spend three hours or more weekly at work dealing with personal-finance issues.1
Using a 10,000-employee company as an example, the 30% stat means it has 3,000 distracted employees, while the 46% stat means that 1,380 of them spend three or more working hours weekly focused on their personal finances. Those 1,380 employees, losing three hours of productivity weekly and working an average of 46 weeks a year, account for 190,440 total hours of lost productivity annually for their company. Using the $17.24 average skilled worker hourly wage cited by PwC, this translates into a $3.3 million
The Long-Term Payoff
You can also look at the financial wellness program ROI by thinking about how much more money it will cost your company if the employees don’t save enough and delay retirement. Prudential pegs the incremental cost of a one-year delay in retirement at more than $50,000 for an individual retirement-age employee, the cost differential between the retiring employee and a newly hired employee. A one-year increase in the workforce’s average retirement age translates into an incremental annual workforce cost of 1.0% to 1.5% for the entire workforce.
Research finds that employees who have gone through a financial wellness program and feel less financially stressed are more apt to increase their deferrals to their retirement plans. A particular Financial Finesse paper gets specific about the increases in contribution rates seen when employees’ financial wellness scores rise. Those higher employee contributions will likely lead to more on-time retirements which, for an employer, means lower salary and benefits costs, among other plusses.
What’s the annual savings? When an organization with 10,000 employees sees overall financial wellness scores improve from 4.0 to 5.0 (on a 10-point scale), the study finds that company saves an estimated $6,570,593 by reducing delayed retirements. And when overall financial wellness scores improve from 4.0 to 6.0, the savings projection jumps to $12,914,642.
Hard numbers like these can get a CFO’s
attention. At your next retirement plan committee meeting, present this
information and then use your company’s headcount to learn the potential
bottom-line impact a financial wellness program could have within your company.